Let's Evaluate Each Other!
Posted: Wednesday, November 18, 2009
by IvanPetryshyn
Ivan Petryshyn
Again, you may agree or not, but when evaluating somebody or someone, one is involved in the operation which might be called mind interchangibility reflections evaluation (MRE). Actualyy, there are 2 parties - MRE1 vs MRE2:
the initial situation of the MRE1 directed on the MRE2 is being corrected subconsciously into MRE1>
the tools, procedures and measures of the evaluation process very often can be the quetion of the memory of the evaluated who is to be very attentive to demand the available accurate means or evidence of the evaluation presupposing that bothe MRE1 and MRE2 have enough or sufficient knowledge and stamina to undergo the process of the evaluation and are ready to risk the possible outcome of the evaluation proper- the weakeness of any of the parties is revealed later when the real situation either proves the evaluation was adequate, accurate and objective or staged, "ordereed" to prove the opposite, and subjective;
the most important part of any evaluation is the level of the moral standards of the two parties, either adequate or not, either human and humane or to certain extent antropocentric, egocentric, altruistic or mysanthropic- the real aim of the evaluation can always be recognized by the preceeding and following events, by the accuracy and the register/style of the situation, by the mutual interdependence of the social roles, either to support the evaluated or to dismantle/ruin his/her reputation, social standards or importance which can be always proved, depending on the goal and the strengthes of the evaluated;
any kind of evaluation, voluntary of required/demanded always depends on the experience, education and knowledgibility of the parties involved; very often , it is not the question who and by whom the evaluator has been given the right to evaluate, it is the question of the real aims of the evaluating party who, for the most, depends on the 3rd party which has hired it; to expect or not to expect the adequacy and the objectiveness of the evaluation is the question of the concrete authority given by another possibly similar authority provoked by another party to prove the already documented ( to make the previous evaluators feel comfortable about the what they have done / even if they have been mistaken, very often on purpose/) or to deprive them of the previously entrusted authority to do it / again on purpose/;
one can fight with the questionable or inferior evaluation in the very same way as one is contesting untruthful statements/realities in the legal procedures.
Ivan Petryshyn
This Article has been viewed 111 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
No comments yet.We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.